Tregs have the potential to establish long-term immune tolerance in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by preserving β cell function. Adoptive transfer of autologous thymic Tregs, although safe, exhibited limited efficacy in previous T1D clinical trials, likely reflecting a lack of tissue specificity, limited IL-2 signaling support, and in vivo plasticity of Tregs. Here, we report a cell engineering strategy using bulk CD4+ T cells to generate a Treg cell therapy (GNTI-122) that stably expresses FOXP3, targets the pancreas and draining lymph nodes, and incorporates a chemically inducible signaling complex (CISC). GNTI-122 cells maintained an expression profile consistent with Treg phenotype and function. Activation of CISC using rapamycin mediated concentration-dependent STAT5 phosphorylation and, in concert with T cell receptor engagement, promoted cell proliferation. In response to the cognate antigen, GNTI-122 exhibited direct and bystander suppression of polyclonal, islet-specific effector T cells from patients with T1D. In an adoptive transfer mouse model of T1D, a mouse engineered-Treg analog of GNTI-122 trafficked to the pancreas, decreased the severity of insulitis, and prevented progression to diabetes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate in vitro and in vivo activity and support further development of GNTI-122 as a potential treatment for T1D.
Gene I. Uenishi, Marko Repic, Jennifer Y. Yam, Ashley Landuyt, Priya Saikumar-Lakshmi, Tingxi Guo, Payam Zarin, Martina Sassone-Corsi, Adam Chicoine, Hunter Kellogg, Martina Hunt, Travis Drow, Ritika Tewari, Peter J. Cook, Soo Jung Yang, Karen Cerosaletti, Darius Schweinoch, Benjamin Guiastrennec, Eddie James, Chandra Patel, Tiffany F. Chen, Jane H. Buckner, David J. Rawlings, Thomas J. Wickham, Karen T. Mueller
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,408 | 0 |
455 | 0 | |
Figure | 534 | 0 |
Table | 26 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 110 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 3,586 | 0 |
Total Views | 3,586 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.